An Honest Discourse, everybody wants one. An attempt to bring some rational thinking, honesty, clarity and meaning to the top issues of the day. Issues included but not limited to are: Politics, Religion, Health, Education, Energy, Civil rights, and our all too brief stay on this planet. EDWARD L. NICE
Friday, November 21, 2014
SNIPPETS OF THE DAY
Friday, November 14, 2014
THIS IS FOR ALL OF THE ACA (OBAMACARE) HATERS AND CONSPIRACISTS
Poll: Good reviews for Obamacare coverage
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/obamacare-health-exchanges-coverage-112892.html#ixzz3J3q9PDsk
GRUBER GRAB GRUBBY
The fake controversy about Jonathan Gruber's claim to be the " Architect of the ACA " is explained by the following paragraph :
“Was he in the administration, was he in the Congress, did he draft provisions of the law?” said Chris Jennings, a health care consultant and former White House aide on health policy. “The answer to all those questions is no, so just by definition he was not the architect of the law. He wasn’t a member [of Congress], he wasn’t an elected leader, he wasn’t [a] staff member to those members, he was not a political or career appointee to the administration. He was a private consultant.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/obamacare-jonathan-gruber-architect-112886_Page2.html#ixzz3J3JIa0gj
Thursday, November 13, 2014
KEYSTONE KOPS KISS
http://www.livescience.com/38735-putting-keystone-pipeline-job-numbers-in-context.html
The construction of Keystone XL, which would generate 3,950 person-years of work according to the U.S. Department of State, has a job creation potential on par with building a shopping mall or the campus renovations the University of Oregon announced last week.
Moreover, after it's built, Keystone XL will only employ between 35 and 50 people — and some of those positions will be filled in Canada. That's a small fraction of the long-term employment benefits one could expect from a shopping mall.
While the Keystone XL tar-sands pipeline is not a national jobs creator, it would be a significant new source of climate pollution, adding 1.2 billion metric tons of carbon pollution to the atmosphere over its estimated lifespan. For that reason it fails the President's climate test and should be rejected.